Card Counter Files Lawsuit Against Biometrica, IP Casino, Security Guard and Biloxi Police Over Database Sharing

The lawsuit, filed in Mississippi, centers on allegations that a blackjack card counter faced targeting and harassment after data from L’Auberge casino reached IP Casino Resort Spa through Biometrica Systems, which led to threats, a false arrest for creating a disturbance, and malicious prosecution despite the plaintiff never playing a single hand at the Biloxi property.

Parties Named in the Filing

Court records list Biometrica Systems as the facial recognition firm that shared the player data, IP Casino Resort Spa as the Biloxi venue where the incident unfolded, security guard Zachary Longino as the individual who allegedly issued threats, and Biloxi police as the department involved in the arrest and subsequent prosecution. The plaintiff claims these parties acted on information transferred from another casino without independent verification, which created the chain of events resulting in legal action.

Sequence of Events Described in the Complaint

According to the suit, the plaintiff arrived at IP Casino Resort Spa yet never participated in any blackjack hands, while the security team identified the individual through Biometrica’s database as an advantage player flagged at L’Auberge. The complaint states that Zachary Longino confronted the plaintiff with threats tied to that shared information, after which Biloxi police responded and effected an arrest on a disturbance charge that the plaintiff maintains lacked basis. The case further alleges malicious prosecution followed the arrest, with proceedings continuing even though no gaming activity occurred at the property.

Role of Casino Databases and Facial Recognition

The filing highlights how casinos maintain and exchange lists of card counters through third-party systems like Biometrica, which allowed data from L’Auberge to travel directly to IP Casino Resort Spa. Observers note that such sharing practices can trigger responses from security personnel before any new interaction takes place, and the plaintiff contends this mechanism operated here without confirmation that the individual posed an actual threat at the second location. The suit questions whether proper protocols existed for verifying the transferred data before escalation to law enforcement.

Legal Claims Presented

The complaint asserts claims of false arrest, malicious prosecution, and harassment stemming from the identification process that relied on external casino data. It further alleges that the plaintiff endured threats from the named security guard and faced charges that Biloxi police pursued without sufficient evidence of any disturbance at IP Casino Resort Spa. Documentation in the case shows the plaintiff seeks remedies for the alleged misuse of the shared database entry and the resulting law enforcement involvement.

Current Status as of August 2026

Proceedings remain active in Mississippi courts as of August 2026, with the plaintiff continuing to pursue the claims against all named defendants. Updates indicate that motions addressing the facial recognition data transfer and the police response have entered the record, while attorneys for the parties prepare for further hearings on the allegations of harassment and prosecution without probable cause.

Conclusion

The case brings attention to the specific chain of events involving Biometrica Systems, IP Casino Resort Spa, Zachary Longino, and Biloxi police after data from L’Auberge reached the Biloxi property. Court documents outline the plaintiff’s position that no gaming occurred at IP yet identification through the shared database prompted the sequence of threats, arrest, and prosecution. Details of the case are available through industry reporting on the filing, and additional context on Mississippi gaming oversight appears via the Mississippi Gaming Commission. The outcome will rest on how the court evaluates the data-sharing practices and the actions that followed at the casino property.